If you look at the
IoD's own member research - it shows a significant regional split on where
expansion should be focused. Having read numerous submissions my gut feeling
is that Gatwick may be given an additional runway, Manchester Airport will
get an additional runway, Birmingham Airport will have a significantly
expanded runway by the end of 2014, Boris Island or similar will be promoted
as a long term alternative to Heathrow, by the Government, whilst expansion
at a number of other airports will also be permitted. It is already happening
at Llydd Airport.
Personally, I would like Heathrow Airport expanded to accommodate two more runways but, I do not see how the Government can get that through Parliament or the courts because of the environmental impact. The promotion of one additional runway might be acceptable - but some argue that is only an interim not, a long-term solution. The likely outcome of the Davis Commission exercise is an attempt to direct development to a number of airports around the country to try and encourage balanced airport expansion because this implies balanced economic development - such simplistic logic ignores failed attempts to get airlines to use Stansted which is currently a white elephant used many by low cost airlines. Such a scenario could do a great deal of harm to UK earnings from aviation and encourage expansion at airports outside the UK. We are already suffering significant political and economic damage as a result of the imposition of Air Passenger Duty which should be abolished or as a minimum reduced significantly. |
By Richard Charman
|
Showing posts with label Gatwick. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gatwick. Show all posts
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
THE HEATHROW DEBATE - WHAT'S THE ANSWER?
We posted a news story on our LinkedIn page yesterday about business travellers wanting another runway at Heathrow Airport. Richard Charman, research manager at HRG, posted a reply. See below. Food for thought, isn't it? We'd love to hear what you think - @btshowlondon or Business Travel Show group on LinkedIn.
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
DEAR PATRICK MCLOUGHLIN, PLEASE PUT PARTY POLITICS TO ONE SIDE FOR THE SAKE OF UK PLC
In the first cabinet reshuffle since the Coalition
Government took power, anti-third runway Transport Secretary Justine Greening has
been ousted and Patrick McLoughlin has taken her place. Not much is known about
Mr McLoughlin transport-wise, apart from the fact he has a fear of flying and
he represents the most landlocked constituency in the UK.
No doubt, airport expansion, and the issue of a third runway
at Heathrow in particular, will be top of his agenda this morning. Speaking on
behalf of the business travel industry – if I may – I urge Mr McLoughlin to use
this opportunity to put party politics to one side, to not succumb to the
NIMBYs (not in my backyards) who will fight against expansion at whichever
airport affects them most, and to focus solely on what’s good for UK PLC.
As the Government continues to dither and decisions are
delayed, cities like Amsterdam, Frankfurt and Paris – all with world-class,
well-connected hubs – continue to attract global corporations and the UK
continues to slide down the scale as a centre of global commerce.
Our lack of
airport capacity is also preventing us from introducing new routes to the BRIC
countries, which is essential to fuel economic growth long term.
In my opinion, that means putting a plan in place to create
a long term transport strategy that will support the UK as a centre for
business and fuel its economy over the next 20-30 years. And in the
short-medium term look to airports such as Gatwick, Luton and Stansted to ease
the capacity issues at Heathrow that everyone is getting so blindsided by.
As event director of the Business Travel Show, I’d like to
extend an invitation to Mr McLoughlin to address the business travel industry
at our event in London next February where he will meet a very eager audience
keen to question him about the issues affecting our business including airport
expansion, APD, green taxes, and high speed rail and franchises.
David Chapple, event director Business Travel Show, david@businesstravelshow.com
Friday, 29 June 2012
HOW DID WE FORGET ABOUT GATWICK?
There
has been pretty much one topic on everyone’s lips in the industry this week and
that is the argument for a third runway at Heathrow Airport. Why? Because the
UK government is due to unveil a consultation document on its new airports
strategy in the next few weeks. Note: the consultation document isn’t about
Heathrow and its third runway. In fact, expansion at Heathrow isn’t even
included as one of the options on the table. And yet, it would appear, all
roads (or should that be runways) keep leading back to Heathrow.
There’s
no doubting that Heathrow is a problem that needs fixing. It’s currently operating
at a perilous 99 per cent capacity. Some have suggested introducing mixed mode
flying (ie using its two runways for inbound and outbound flights) to increase
this capacity by 15 per cent and another 10 million passengers per year.
But,
in my opinion, Heathrow is a bit of red herring in this whole debate. We need
to stop talking about it and get back to the real issue: how is aviation going to grow over the next 20, 30 years
and how are we going to build an infrastructure fit for purpose to continue
supporting the growth of UK Plc?
In the short term, the answer is not Heathrow. Or Marsden. Or
Boris Island. Let’s open our eyes and look to other airports in the South East,
airports with capacity: Luton, Stansted, Gatwick.
Gatwick,
for one, is currently operating at around 80 per cent capacity on its single
runway. It’s projected to grow to 40 million passengers by 2020 with that one
runway (it’s currently at just under 34 million). It’s connected to London for
business better than any other airport, with train links to Victoria, London
Bridge, City Link and Kings Cross. And it’s currently
investing around £20 million per month into new passenger facilities as part of
a six year £1.2 billion programme due for completion around 2014/2015. This
investment and infrastructure make Gatwick a great option for business
travellers.
But I’m not here to champion Gatwick over Heathrow, or Stansted
over Boris Island. I’m here to champion common sense and to say let’s park
Heathrow for now and start thinking long term for the good of this
industry.
Posted by David Chapple - talk to him on Twitter @btshowlondon or david@businesstravelshow.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


